Use your AI visibility report to choose your next change.

Open the matching buyer question in a Ready Scan report and read the original ChatGPT answer. Check mentions, target-site citations and recommendations separately. An absent brand describes this sample, not every possible answer. Prepare a private report with a public product or service page and the questions your buyers actually ask.

Check my brand

1. Check completed and scored coverage

   Planned, returned and conclusively scored answers are different counts. Failed or inconclusive answers are missing evidence, not a zero for the brand. Check coverage before interpreting an absence.

2. Keep the buyer need in view

   The report covers your one to four selected questions. Read the exact need, constraints and market. A question about an unsupported feature does not establish that the business is generally invisible.

3. Use the score to find the answer

   New reports show AI Visibility Score: the mean of eligible answer outcome points with capped target-citation credit. Recommendation rankings are separate. Historical reports retain their saved scoring formula. The grade is a summary band; follow the question rows to understand the result.

Compare dated reports with the same buyer questions and compatible settings, then read which answers changed. Ready Scan’s public Hong Kong programme tracks ten industries with ten selected brands each, weekly using fixed questions. Explore public score tracking. Automatic monitoring of your own workspace is unavailable during public beta.

Explore public score tracking

1. Compare like with like

   Keep question wording, region, language, AI systems and compatible model/settings together. Check the original observation dates and answer coverage. A single baseline is not a trend; a missing value is not zero.

2. Read the change question by question

   Record new mentions, citations or recommendations and the wording behind them. Keep the earlier report. Different questions, systems or coverage can change a score without showing that a website edit caused an improvement.

Read the Gemini and Claude answers to the same buyer question, then compare which brands they mention and under what conditions they recommend them. Use industry rankings to reach the standard reports behind the public comparison. This is a comparison of retained answers, not a ranking of every possible AI conversation.

Explore industry rankings

1. Open the original wording

   Read the complete wording. A name in a list is not automatically a recommendation. Preserve conditions such as team size, plan, budget or integration when interpreting the answer.

2. Keep competitors and workarounds distinct

   A direct competitor, a manual workaround and a different product category are not the same comparison. Notice whether the same comparable brand recurs across buyer questions.

3. Read returned sources as context

   Follow the specific returned page when it helps explain the answer. A source link does not by itself establish a recommendation, show that every returned page was cited or reveal a hidden influence weight.

Start with the report’s highest-priority useful page action. Address the buyer need with a direct answer, a documented example or a clear comparison on an existing page. New reports connect the proposed page edit to retained answers and a completion check. Use the practical page-improvement guide for the next step.

Use the page-improvement guide

1. Turn one finding into one page decision

   Use the linked page, proposed heading or draft example and priority rationale. Explain the supported offering and who it fits. For example, a small-team question may call for clearer fit and limits, not a larger feature list. Keep content that already helps buyers.

2. Make the change inspectable

   After editing, a new visitor should find the answer, example and relevant next link in readable HTML. Record the page URL and date, then use a later authorized like-for-like check to observe visibility. Publishing an edit alone is not proof of a citation gain.

3. Take the evidence into your existing workflow

   Copy for AI Agent carries the report’s actions, page links and answer references into a website-editing conversation. Grant only the access and publication permission you intend; keep private report material private.

The report describes the retained sample and provides evidence-linked interpretation. It is not an audit of every possible AI answer, a forecast of future recommendations or an automatic website implementation programme.